Nicolas Kicker vs Arvid Nordquist Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Mar at 12:33 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Kicker vs A. Nordquist

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kicker 1 - 0 Nordquist
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nicolas Kicker winning 2 and Arvid Nordquist winning 0. The last match between Nicolas Kicker and Arvid Nordquist was at the Asuncion Challenger, 16-03-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Nicolas Kicker getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kicker | 1 |
| Nordquist | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Asuncion Challenger(03-16-25)
N. Kicker vs A. Nordquist H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $521,720 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.28% (412-283) | Career Total W/L | 50.55% (137-134) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 18 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Kicker vs A. Nordquist Match Preview:
In terms of second serve performance in recent months, Nordquist has outperformed Kicker, winning 48.07% of points compared to Kicker's 40.09%. This statistic is significant for predicting match outcomes. The return game stats further emphasize the competitive edge between these two players. Nordquist has succeeded in winning 36.02% of their opponent’s second serve points, while Kicker has won 47.42%. For first serve returns, Nordquist has managed 34.16%, closely matched by Kicker's 30.98%, numbers that align closely with predicting the favored player in this head-to-head contest.
When under pressure, specifically in saving breakpoints, Kicker has demonstrated a higher capacity with a save percentage of 42.98%, in contrast to Nordquist's 36.21%. Such statistics are essential for in-game betting predictions. Assessing overall performance over the past year, Kicker boasts a higher match win rate of 58.33% (W/L 21/15) compared to Nordquist's 54.84% (W/L 17/14), which influences head-to-head predictions.
Both players show varying capabilities across different surfaces. Nordquist's strongest surface is clay with a career win percentage of 53% (W/L 52/47), while their weakest is indoor hard, with a 47% win rate (W/L 15/17). Kicker’s best career surface is also clay, achieving an impressive win percentage of 60% (W/L 335/224), whereas their performance on indoor hard is notably poor, with a 0% win rate (W/L 0/1). This divergence in surface performance can be crucial in match predictions.
Analyzing the level of competition, Kicker has played against opponents with a tougher average rank of 284.42 over the last 12 months compared to Nordquist’s opponents with an average rank of 445.58. This disparity might give Kicker a slight edge in terms of experience against higher-level competition. Additionally, if the match extends to a deciding set, Kicker has a notable advantage, having won 71% of deciding sets, whereas Nordquist holds a 50% success rate.
In recent gameplay format, Nordquist has focused mostly on Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with a match win percentage of 55.17% (W/L 16/13). In comparison, Kicker has thrived in the same circuit, showcasing a win percentage of 73.68% (W/L 14/5). Such distinctions in experience and success at similar event levels influence the prediction of the match outcome.
Finally, the capability of converting break points is a vital stat for determining the likely victor. Nordquist has a conversion rate of 26.53%, whereas Kicker has converted 41.88% of breakpoint opportunities, suggesting a higher likelihood of scoring against opponents. Based on this comprehensive analysis of statistical data, Kicker stands as the favorite to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Nicolas Kicker vs Arvid Nordquist Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Kicker vs A. Nordquist H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:31:4 | Average Match Time | 1:31:4 |
| 58% (29/50) | 1st Serve % | 71% (47/66) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (31/47) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/19) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 53% (35/66) | Return Points Win % | 32% (16/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Kicker Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-2 5-1 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
A. Nordquist Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 1-2 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 3-6 10-3 | ||

N. Kicker vs A. Nordquist Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.28% (412/283) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.55% (137/134) |
| 57.33% (935/696) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.61% (305/286) |
| 53.09% (8033/7097) | Games Win/Loss | 51.82% (2800/2603) |
| 52.94% (36/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.74% (69/67) |
| 60.48% (375/245) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.49% (52/49) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.06% (16/18) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 755 | Aces Total | 268 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1068 | Total Double Faults | 388 |
| 1:15:33 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 536.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 359.71 |
| 65% (21936/33519) | 1st Serve % | 66% (6005/9088) |
| 65% (14359/21936) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (3838/6005) |
| 52% (5967/11583) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1492/3083) |
| 44% (1613/3679) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (365/825) |
| 42% (14210/34082) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3462/8963) |
| 26.92% (7/19) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.16% (28/34) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.48% (193/137) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 67.68% (178/85) | Futures W/L | 50.94% (136/131) |
| 59% (404/680) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (136/263) |
| 46% (6/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (100/186) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (25/54) |
| 53% (120/226) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (24/55) |
| 85% (410/348) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (147/129) |
| 15% (410/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (147/18) |
| 22% (285/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (124/8) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
